I'd say it's a bug in the sense that the compiler assumes something
starting with "[" and ending with "]" can only possibly be a set in that
context.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Ryan Joseph <r...@thealchemistguild.com>
wrote:
> I mentioned this as an aside a while ago but I don’t remember getting a
> response so I’d like to formally reintroduce the issue.
>
> Should I file a bug report for this or is it expected behavior? Personally
> I’d really like to get implicit array overloads working properly.
>
>
>
>
> program test;
>
> type
> TMyClass = class
> end;
>
> operator + (left: TMyClass; right: array of integer): TMyClass; overload;
> var
> i: integer;
> begin
> for i in right do
> writeln('add ', i);
> result := left;
> end;
>
> var
> c: TMyClass;
> begin
> c += [1, 2, 3]; // ERROR: Operator is not overloaded: "TMyClass" +
> "Set Of Byte"
> end.
>
> Regards,
> Ryan Joseph
>
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
