Jonas Maebe wrote:
> C Western wrote:
>> The following innocuous looking code generates a range check error:
>>
>> {$R+}
>> function Count: qword;
>> begin
>> Result := 0;
>> end;
>> var
>> i: Integer;
>> begin
>> for i := 0 to Count-1 do
>> WriteLn(i);
>> end.
>>
>> I can (more or less) see why
> I changed the type used to evaluate for-loop bounds in ISO Pascal mode
> because of https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=24318 . Maybe the
> same should be done for other non-TP/Delphi modes too.
Actually, it won't help because "qword - 1" will still be evaluated as
qword. The issue is that there is no safe way to evaluate this with
range checking that is correct in all cases without a 128 bit integer type:
1) if you evaluate it as qword, you get a range error if count is 0 (as
above)
2) if you evaluate it as int64, then if count is high(int64)+1 you will
get a range error even though the result could be represented in int64
In this particular case, because the counter is 32 bit (which seems
quite unsafe for use with a container whose "count" property is 64 bit),
using int64 would be "correct", but it's not a systemic solution (as
shown above) and hence not something to implement in the language.
Jonas
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
