On Fri, October 20, 2017 12:06, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On 2017-10-20 10:51, Tomas Hajny wrote: . . > Bottom line.... Having the general license file for the "packages" > directory under the "rtl" directory makes even less sense.
It does make some sense in my view, because anybody using the packages needs to have and use either the RTL directory, or the binary installation. Since there is a reference to a particular file available, it shouldn't be very difficult to find that file using appropriate tools even if you don't know the location at first. Hence I would suggest spending time on more useful things than playing with the location of a license file in the SVN repository, but that's just my view and others may see it differently, of course. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
