On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-10-09 09:08, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Because it was never meant to be a TClientDataset equivalent, but it has
grown into something that does many of the things TClientDataset does.
Naming it TClientDataset would imply that we ensure TClientDataset
compatibility, which definitely was/is not the case.
OK, that's understandable. Thanks for the background information.
Historic reasons. It existed before TBufDataset.
Rewriting TMemdataset so it sits on top of TBufDataset is since long on
So it is recommended to use TBufDataset over TMemDataset?
Yes, absolutely.
If anyone is interested in tackling these problems (implement
TClientDataset,
TMemDataset rebase)
Ah, I see Git is growing on you [using git terminology there]. ;-)
It definitely has a way of crawling under your skin... ;)
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
