On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote: > Am 23.08.2017 19:39 schrieb "Marcos Douglas B. Santos" <m...@delfire.net>: >> >> Wait a minute. Now I realize that procedure IShellLinkHelper.Save is a >> real implementation not by a class, but by a "interface helper". >> It's like default methods in Java(?) that we have code inside an >> interface... > > I don't know about Java, but the C# equivalent would be extension methods. > And yes, that's the point: the implementation is not part of the interface > implementer, but the user of the interface can add some implementation. > (Same for class, record and primitive types helpers)
Would we have any problem of memory leaks using Interface helper with COM interfaces (refcount)? I mean, the "type helper" has constructor/destructor to create/release something? Best regards, Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
