In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: > Bottom line is, with the exact same code, NO work-arounds is required > for GCC or Java!
Then maybe the original code was DESIGNED for gcc and/or java ? > So why must we have work-arounds for FPC? The language is different. E.g. I get crashes too, but they are floating point divide by zeros that FPC traps, but other languages often not (but with corrupt results) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
