On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:09:53 +0000 Graeme Geldenhuys <mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2016-12-08 14:01, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > That would be a 64bit per pixel image, wasting a lot of memory. > > Why FPImage uses 64bit per pixel is beyond me! The original author of > FPImage clearly thought he/she saw something cool in that, but 99.99999% > of the time *nobody* needs that. It's causing more grief (and code to do > conversions) than anything else. The 64bit is the maximum limit. I doubt the 99.99999%. Image editing require more than 8bit per channel since decades. > > Or add some helper procedures, for some common cases. > > This might be a good solution. Some ready-made event handlers. Any idea how that should look like? Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
