Sven Barth wrote:
Am 19.08.2016 09:55 schrieb "Jonas Maebe" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> As alluded to above, LLVM support needs to be added/tested/maintained
> separately for each supported architecture and to a lesser extent for
> each supported OS. Right now, I only have plans for x86-64 and AArch64
> (and maybe PowerPC64), on Darwin and Linux. Personally, I won't add
> support for Windows since I don't use that platform. Support for 32 bit
> platforms in general will be a bit tricky due to the way our compiler is
> structured.
Why is it that 32-bit targets would be a bit tricky to implement?
Regards,
Sven
I believe because of this:
There are also a few LLVM limitations over which I have no influence:
<snip>
b) LLVM has no support for the i386 "register" calling convention, so I
will probably never add support for the i386 target using LLVM
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
