El 13/08/16 a les 00:28, Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
On 12/08/16 22:51, Luca Olivetti wrote:
El 12/08/16 a les 20:40, Jonas Maebe ha escrit:
On 12/08/16 20:32, Sven Barth wrote:
Better don't rely on it then. If at all it would be implemented
properly
(and for Delphi compatibility it probably will).
According to the bug report mentioned in the first message of this
thread, Delphi only supports overloading for default properties.
Is there a reason for implementing it "properly" only for the default
property? (apart from delphi compatibility).
I don't see a difference between default and other properties for this
particular issue.
In many cases, when we implement something like that differently than
Delphi, in hindsight there indeed was a good reason for the original
Delphi behaviour even if we didn't see it immediately. So I'm very wary
to stray from that path nowadays.
Oh, well, I'll change the code to use a method call instead of a
property then.
I still don't see the rationale though.
Bye
--
Luca
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
