On Fr, 2016-07-22 at 18:20 -0400, James Richters wrote: > I'm trying to avoid custom hardware if possible. I have always used > parallel ports and never had a problem with them until now. I like the > idea of a parallel port because they are still built onto motherboards, and > there are also a TON of USB to parallel port adapters out there. I'm > trying to keep this simple. > > I put a repository of my test program here: > https://github.com/Zaaphod/FPC-Parallel-Port. Perhaps someone can see what > I'm doing wrong. I'm reading 255s no matter what I do. I included my > old turbo pascal test program. I would normally specify the port in hex > with a $ like this $378. I could write to the port then read back what I > just wrote.. which is what I am trying to do now.. I don't have anything > hooked up to the port yet, I should be able to write to it and read it back. > > I seem to be accessing the DLL correctly, because I tried it on a windows 7 > computer and IsInpOutDriverOpen was false, because I forgot to install the > driver, once I installed the driver IsInpOutDriverOpen is now true, so that > tells me I'm accessing the DLL and the DLL is confirming the driver is open.
>From what I know, although it may be a bit outdated, on windows external functions have to be declared 'cdecl'. Which isn't so in the library port to pascal. One example: implementation Function IsInpOutDriverOpen; external 'inpout32.DLL'; would then be: implementation Function IsInpOutDriverOpen; cdecl; external 'inpout32.DLL'; HTH, Marc _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal