On 20/05/16 09:40, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On 2016-05-20 09:36, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: >> I think a “x percentage of capacity” increment is the way to go. eg: 5 >> or 10% > > Scrap that idea. In hind sight, % increments is what is causing the problem. > > Regards, > Graeme
And actually why not 'just' allocate exactly what is needed on demand ? May be slower but even less overhead. -L. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
