On Wed, 11 May 2016, Maciej Izak wrote:
2016-05-11 14:23 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org>:
Where is that written ? As far as I know, it is only there because classes
is there, and classes has some define to allow it to be compiled with fgl.
by Sven (29 January 2016 10:54 thread "Generics.Collections as package for
Lazarus or package for FPC RTL"):
"also fgl is a nice test durog cycling the compiler that nothing basic was
broken with generics; one of the main reason it's still in rtl and not
rtl-objpas or rtl-extra"
Well I missed that, but I think this argument will be overruled, it is
rather a weak one.
keeping module in RTL just to have nice test to check compiler cycle is
... very very very strange.
I agree. And hence I think we will move it.
There should not be double standards.
If the consequence is that the fgl unit should move as well: No problem
with that.
If we will keep right order then I have no problem with Generics.* as
rtl-generics package, and I can realize my plans with compiler in other,
more correct way.
See the reply by Marco. We'll be moving units out of RTL, rather than in.
That includes fgl and classes (better late than never ;) ).
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
