Michael Van Canneyt wrote on Tue, 02 Feb 2016:
[evaluating all arguments to a function/intrinsic]
I'm just trying to to put any foaming-at-the-mouth argumentation using this particular argument in perspective.
I think this is rather disingenuous after your own foaming-at-the-mouth hyperbole (?) of reverting all changes and temporarily shutting down the svn server if someone else did something that you considered to be fundamentally wrong.
For a correct understanding: The compiler must behave predictable at all times, no arguing there. But I don't think that iif() having different semantics than all other functions, is a problem.
Including all other functions called iif().
It just needs to be documented properly. It is a non-issue for me.
It is a deal breaker for me. Jonas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
