Am 02.02.2016 10:38 schrieb "Marco van de Voort" <mar...@stack.nl>: > > - I like &if ;) > > I don't see the point. And if a funky character is needed then use another > one, don't add a third overload to &. (statement to intrinsic instead of > statement to identifier and octal)
He meant to use "if" as the name for the intrinsic which requires it to be called as "&if(...)" which would merely be a use of the identifier escape. Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
