Am 01.02.2016 17:00 schrieb "silvioprog" <silviop...@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:48 PM, leledumbo <leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id> wrote: >> >> > Looks good and clever. Logical choice. How often you have variables with & >> prefix? >> >> Only when I use ORM with automapping of properties to fields (for fields >> whose name clash with reserved words such as the most common 'type'). I >> won't use it in other cases. >> >> Agree with Michael, no & please. > > > I agree with Michael too. No & please, it can conflict with ported codes from C. >
While I agree with Michael I don't agree with you. We already have "&" which is used for two purposes: - binary numbers - escaping keywords The &if would merely be an application of the latter which already works since AFAIK 2.4.0. Also you can't have "&if" in C-code as C does not allow you to escape identifiers. And an address of an if statement is also not possible. Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
