On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Marco van de Voort <mar...@stack.nl> wrote: > In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas said: >> >> Inheritance breaks encapsulation. This was written even in GoF Patterns. >> There are many post, on the web, explaining why inheritance is evil. >> I searched on Google right now: >> http://blog.berniesumption.com/software/inheritance-is-evil-and-must-be-destroyed/ >> http://www.javaworld.com/article/2073649/core-java/why-extends-is-evil.html > > Such rants are in direct opposition of GoF. GoF never meant to push a set of > unbendable rules. They just wanted to standarize jargon, and describe > somethings they encountered (without any claim that everybody should use > it).
I only chose two links to put into the email. There are many other ... I just pointed some examples because they have examples. In my GoF book (Portuguese version), page 34, says: ...It is often said that "inheritance violates encapsulation"... [free translation] Page 35: "Preferably the object composition instead of class inheritance." [free translation] > > Aside from the fact that interfaces is still inheritance. This is different. There is no behavior, only a contract. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
