Maybe types should be forbidden at this place completely.
Look at this:
1.) with subrg type - works ok !!
program testin;
type subrg = 1..10;
var i: integer;
begin
for i in subrg do begin
writeln (i)
end
end.
2.) with subrg type in in-expression - gives syntax error
program testin;
var i: integer;
begin
for i in 1.. 10 do begin
writeln (i)
end
end.
3.) with set constant in in-expression - works ok
program testin;
var i: integer;
begin
for i in [1.. 10] do begin
writeln (i)
end
end.
Only the 3rd example should be supported, IMO.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 20.06.2015 um 14:03 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 20/06/15 12:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 20/06/15 11:41, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
But it is a bug that the compiler does not give an error for the set
type. Please report it.
Should it work with any set types at all? (I don't mean set variables,
but set types) Or even with any type? It seems very much like
something
that was accidentally introduced, like what was reverted with
http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_2.6.0#.3COrdinal.3E_in_.3CSet_type.3E_is_now_forbidden
It should definitely work with sets, that was explicitly asked (I am
sure, because I asked). I use it in my code.
Again: set *variables* or set *types*?
Ah sorry, I misunderstood your remark. Variables.
I don't see the point of allowing it on a set type. You can just as
well use the underlying enum.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
