> I didn't continue yet because I'am not sure if subarch-abi are sufficient or if another directory > level with e.g. fpu type, custom options (debugging info, optimization > level etc.) might be useful. > Or if it would be only over engineering ...
fpcmkcfg already generates $fpcsubarch-$fpcmemorymodel for 8086 target (although the make script uses 'msdos' only as directory name), so I guess at least $fpcsubarch is enough for arm. I don't think custom options are necessary to support, but providing config macros for them could be useful. bad suggestion: consider it different target processor, so we have ppcrossarmel & ppcrossarmhf -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/FPC-ARMEL-and-ARMHF-under-the-same-tree-tp5721845p5721853.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
