On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Michael Schnell <mschn...@lumino.de> wrote: > On 02/26/2015 11:28 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: >> >> >> Not ALL interfaces are reference-counted and auto-destroying. You can >> create CORBA-style interfaces which are _not_ reference counted but >> still have the full advantage of a interface. > > I see. > > hence "interface" denotes two language constructs that work decently > different :( > > The mingling of language features and externally imposed paradigms regarding > the word "interface" for me created a hardly understandable mess.
Works different, but they are different! FPC give us the option to use CORBA or "COM" interfaces. I use last, because auto-destroying is very usefull -- I don't see what is wrong with auto-destroying. For example, this project is object-oriented and interface-based (auto-destroying). No memleaks. https://github.com/mdbs99/AWS Best regards, Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
