I mean T.Suspend, so u resume it then suspend it
25.02.2015, 18:16, "hinsta...@yandex.ru" <hinsta...@yandex.ru>: > not sure if this helps, but: > for example, if you want thread T to run using approx. 70% of max. available > capacity, try this: > > repeat > T.Resume; > Sleep(70); > T.Resume; > Sleep(30); > until ... > > so T runs for 70 ms, then sleeps for 30 ms, etc > > 25.02.2015, 18:06, "Xiangrong Fang" <xrf...@gmail.com>: >> 2015-02-25 22:47 GMT+08:00 Dmitry Boyarintsev <skalogryz.li...@gmail.com>: >>> I presume most of the systems would make the sleeping thread to yield the >>> execution time for other threads. >>> The questionable behavior might occur in case of sleep(0); (should it >>> yield the remaining time or just return immediately - up to the OS). >>> And multi-cpu might also do something different. >> Yes, I am particularly interested in behavior of SMP system. i.e. my >> purpose of using threads is to take full advantages of all CPU cores. >> >> As far as I know, setting thread priority does not always work, it may >> require root privilege for example. I would like to use Sleep() to control >> relative time share of all threads in the pool. For example, I run 3 >> threads on a dual-core system, with thread 1 and 2 share core-1, and thread >> 3 taking all computing power of core-2... >> >> Now the problem is, can I use Sleep to control thread 1 to run at 50% of >> the speed of thread 2 (which is not throttled), providing that all threads >> are doing same kind of task, so that they are comparable? >> >> Xiangrong >> >> , >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org >> http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
