2014-06-05 17:13 GMT-03:00 Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com>: > Hello together! > > I've finally come around to implement support for partial specializations. > Partial specializations are for specializations of generics inside another > generic. Up to now simply the generic type was used instead of a > specializations (e.g. TTest<> instead of TTest<LongInt>) which often > resulted in failed type checks. With the addition of partial > specializations the amount of these errors should hopefully be decreased > and I'll check the corresponding bug reports in the next few days. > > Nevertheless partial specializations quite heavily changed how the parsing > of generics works and thus I need your help. I already checked that there > are no regressions in our testsuite, but maybe our testsuite does not yet > contain a test for something that is now broken. So if you use generics OR > you use nested records (yes, I needed to change something there as well) > then I'd like you to test whether any regression in your code was > introduced between the following Free Pascal revisions: > > 27860 (no partial specializations) > 27861 (partial specializations) > > So if something fails in revision 27861 that did not fail in 27860 I'd > like you to report this with tag "partial specializations" (it should > already exist in the tag list) and I'll fix that ASAP. > > Thank you very much. :) > > Regards, > Sven
Very nice! Is there any documentation showing some examples how to test it? Well done! (y) -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
