On 05/22/2014 06:17 PM, Craig Peterson wrote:
This is exactly the "data marshalling" I was talking about.
.. And what you seemingly want to avoid.
I suppose "technically" this method - especially when using the "event
record pool" Marco mentioned - does not seem to have any great
disadvantages.
As said, for the user some syntax candy might be beneficial.
rather simple:
- declaring the event method as something like "closure" resulting it
having it do an auto-free on exit.
more advanced (needing the RTL to provide pool of threads to fire on
demand):
- "parallel loop" and "future" support like in "Prism"
(In fact I don't see "anonymous functions" - see thread topic - here.)
What do you think,
-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
