On Sat, April 5, 2014 17:26, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > On Sat, 5 Apr 2014, Jonas Maebe wrote: > >> On 05/04/14 15:11, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: >>> On 2014-04-05 13:07, Jonas Maebe wrote: >>>> > >>>> >-v- doesn't do anything, it's -v0 that should switch off all output >>>> >(except for errors and fatal errors). >>> Thanks. So what is the difference between -ve and -v0? >> >> -ve does not switch anything off, it only enables showing errors (e.g., >> if it >> was disabled first via -ve-). -v0 switches off everything but error >> reporting. > > ...Supposedly, in view of the bugreport and trouble experienced by Graeme > ;) > > That said, I find it strange, because I have all verbosity except errors > switched off, > and it works.
As mentioned yesterday, I tested it under Win32 with the 2.6.4 compiler and it worked according to specification. It apparently works well for Jonas too on his Mac OS X machine (according to his note added to the bug report). We clearly need to find out more information about the differences leading to the incorrect behaviour. That's why I asked the bug reporter to provide information about his platform (one difference which I can see that Graeme uses the x86_64 version - not that it should make any difference, but all possibilities need to be analyzed), check if -n changes anything and test if it works the same also with the simplest source files. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
