On 19.03.2014 23:01, Timothy Groves wrote: > Is there a drop-dead simple way to clone an object? > > I've got a small tree of classes (tBaseProfile, and four descendants > of such). Only the descendant classes are instantiated. I need to be > able to create new copies of these objects for use in other lists. > > At the moment, I am writing a Duplicate method that returns the new > object. But this means assigning all of the data to the duplicated > object. There must be an easier way! There is usually a good reason to NOT do it blindly for all members and why you don't find a default "clone" method in any programming language in can think of right now.
Just think about it: you clone a database object (from an ORM or similar). How far does the clone/copy go? Will you also clone the associated database connection object? Probably not, so your manual code would only assign the same reference to the clone. However the table name, field name, sql statement etc. will be copied. Or think about file access: your object has a TFileStream as member. Will you clone that? What if the access was read/write and maybe even exclusive? IMHO there is no one-size-fits-all here. Best regards, Andreas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
