On 17/02/2014 17:28, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Am 2014-02-17 18:01, schrieb Martin Frb:
> On 17/02/2014 16:40, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> It appears, that the copy-on-setlength is intended. So in that the
documentation is right.
It is intended but is was not mentioned in the documentation.
Therefore this whole thread exists at all.
Then why does this discussion continue, now that it is documented?
Does it matter what other people consider a write and what not? (Unless
that part made it into the docs, but there was no mention it did)?
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
