On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 31.12.2013 15:09, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 31.12.2013 00:48 schrieb "Dmitry Boyarintsev"
>>> <skalogryz.li...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some new syntax has to be introduced to avoid the warning. Something
>>>> like:
>>>>
>>>> type
>>>> TMyRec = record
>>>> record procedure Print;
>>>> end;
>>>>
>>>> record procedure TMyRec.Print;
>>>> begin
>>>> writeln('foo');
>>>> end;
>>>
>>>
>>> We don't need a new syntax for something that already works:
>>>
>>> === code begin ===
>>>
>>> type
>>> TMyRec = record
>>> class procedure Print; static;
>>> end;
>>>
>>> class procedure TMyRec.Print;
>>>
>>>
>>> begin
>>> writeln('foo');
>>> end;
>>>
>>> begin
>>> TMyRec.Print;
>>> end.
>>>
>>> === code end ===
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sven
>>
>>
>> Yes, but if is need to use like this, is better using the sintaxe
>> Unit.Function...
>
>
> Depends on the preference of the developer I'd say. I personally prefer the
> usage of "typename.method" instead of "unit.function" for example.
Me too, but without warnings. ;-)
I prefer to group procedures/functions (utilities) inside
object/record (in classes too, of course) instead using unit.function
sintaxe. IMHO the code is more readable and organized.
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
