On Fri, November 29, 2013 11:00, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
> On 28.11.2013 18:32, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On Thu, November 28, 2013 18:12, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
>>> Sorry, I forgot to mention there is {$Q-} in the source.
>>
>> I believe that $Q- covers overflow checks, not range checks.
>
> Thanks, this showed me the right direction.
>
> Explanation: I'm trying to port code from Turbo Pascal. There
> word1-word2 does wrap around with {$Q-}{$R+}. And dec(word1) never
> checks for overflow, even with {$Q+}{$R+}.
>
> FreePascal seems to have a wider definition of Range Check, and the
> inc() and dec() functions do check for overflow.
This is because TP is 16-bit (word), whereas FPC (in particular your
compilation target in FPC) is 32-bit (longword).
> The longint trick prevents runtime error 201, but causes runtime error
> 215 if the longword value does not fit into longint.
>
> On closer look this is all behaving like documented, just different from
> TurboPascal (maybe it would have worked in TP-compatibility-mode).
{$MODE TP} wouldn't change this. Only the i8086-msdos target (16-bit)
should behave the same way as TP from this point of view.
> The correct fix is to simply add {$R-} to the code wherever it currently
> has {$Q-}. I have just done this, and now it passes the test.
That was indeed one of my proposed solutions ({$R-} is equivalent to
{$OVERFLOWCHECKS OFF}).
Tomas
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
