On Thu, November 28, 2013 09:03, Sven Barth wrote: > Am 28.11.2013 08:33, schrieb Andreas Schneider: >> Maybe a bit late, but that might not be true. If Timothy really talks >> about _object_ (and not _class(TObject)_) it should work as he does >> it. Also Destroy would probably be appropriate. Just saying :-) The >> actual type defs used are missing. > Unlikely. Quote of Timothy: >> How exactly are instantiated classes treated in an array? > So it's very likely that he is indeed talking about descendants of > TObject.
Agreed. BTW, note that reference to "TObject" is not the best solution for differentiation between "old" objects and classes, because TObject type exists for both. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
