On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
<gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded
HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy, tiWebServer, FPC, nYume etc). I
must agree with Michael, fphttpserver is a good choice. There is a bit of a
learning curve [compared to some others], but nothing major. Overall, I'm
very happy with the final choice on fphttpserver.
Out of curiosity, how is its performance compared to Indy based web server.
fphttpserver was not built for speed.
I would not dare to make this comparison.
My current employer has a highly optimized data system with custom web
server and custom DB. No SQL sentences and no SQL DBs obviously. The
load it can handle is quite impressive.
It manages information for schools: personnel, students, courses,
exams, timetables, messaging etc.
That is the exact description of my previous job :)
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal