2013/10/26 Dmitry Boyarintsev <skalogryz.li...@gmail.com> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Fabrício Srdic > <fabricio.sr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> I agree with the importance of backward compatibility, but I disagree >> when it becomes a reason to stop the implementation of improvements in the >> tool. >> > > Well, no. You shouldn't say "improvement". Because "improvement" has > positive context, already. > Instead, you should use the word "change" which is more neutral. > > So let me paraphrase you: "I agree with the importance of backward > compatibility, but I disagree when it becomes a reason to stop the > implementation of changes in the tool." > Doesn't sounds so bright, right? Because it's unknown if a change is good, > if it helps or if it is beneficial. >
If the namespace feature isn't a improvement, so why was it added to fpc?
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
