On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Delphi uses winapi, not windows.
And I see no need. There is so much code in use that assumes the standard
names, and I don't see a need to force existing codebase users to rename
everything just to free up a few unit names for packages that are
essentially free to chose their own.
There is a need. Without it, you will severely cripple the use of default
namespaces.
If someone
* defines a namespace 'mycompany',
* uses that namespace as the default namespace
* has a 'classes' unit (or anything else that name-clashes with our units) in
that namespace
he/she will never be able to use our classes unit again.
Yes. And he deserves it IMHO.
Strange reaction.
As I said: the above scenario is the very reason why namespaces were invented
to begin with.
We make a feature available, and then you are going to say to users of this
feature
"if you use it as intended, it is your own fault, you deserve what you get"
What kind of attitude is that ?
We can discuss the desirability of the namespaces feature.
I am of the opinion that we didn't need them at all.
But OK, Delphi compatibility and so on. We know the reasons.
But if we do decide to introduce them, then we must be consequent all the way through
and support their use as intended. That includes IMHO releasing a RTL/FCL whatnot with
all the proper namespaces.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
