08.10.2013 17:35, Graeme Geldenhuys пишет:
All good and well, but I really don't see the point of a class that you can't extend. The original developer can never foresee all possible use cases in the future. We already have issues with some classes defining fields or methods and private, when they would have been better suited as protected. Sealed classes are just going to make matters worse. It defeats the whole purpose of OOP.
Just open the old mail thread - the question was discussed there with your participation (as I remember). There is no need to repeat it again.
Best regards, Paul Ishenin _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
