On 04.10.2013 18:13, ko paka wrote:
Hello,
Are there some practical differences which one to use on linux ?
When I will use only fpwidestring, then when use functions
CompareUnicodeString / CompareWideString and current_Collation is nil,
then routine is recalled on OldManager, where those functions are not
implemented. Because of that I need to add cwstring before fpwidestring.
Will be those functions implemented into fpwidestring later or correct
way is to add and register collation I need (cz) into fpc ?
Correct way is to register the collation you need. AFAIK it's also
possible to register that at runtime, but I have to admit that I haven't
followed the discussion of the features of fpwidestring that closely, so
someone else will need to definitely answer that...
The main difference is that cwstring uses the Widestring manager of the
system's C library while fpwidestring is a full Pascal Widestring manager.
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
