On 24/09/2013 14:25, Marco van de Voort wrote: > In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said: <snip> >>> Because that has an use. The internal FPC compatability, specially in >>> the more fringe areas like this, service no use than fattening maillist >>> archives IMHO. >> >> If you don't see a use for backward compatibility for existing code... > > I see it only as an starting point, not as a rigid unbendable rule. > _
There is just *no* way the second and the first statements can possibly match. Furthermore you ignore any nuanced response I post and just repeat some point you stated earlier. Yes, I suppose it's an exchange of views but it is not useful at all. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
