On 9/7/13, Jürgen Hestermann <juergen.hesterm...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Of course! Why the hell should there be double pathdelims? And why
> (silently) accept them as if they were one?
There should not be, but (history: DOS and) WinApi accept them, so the
are NOT illegal in normal filenames.
> '/' etc, because these are illegal
> > characters in a filename on Windows.
>
> Illegal characters should be taken just like that: Illegal characters. Why
> should they be accepted/converted? Who adds illegal characters and expects
> them to be silently converted to something legal? Just the opposite.
They ('/','.') are only illegal in the '\\?\ scheme, they are
perfectly legal (but are converted by WinApi) in "normal" filenames.
> > You would also not be able to open files with a relative path:
> > (And in a threaded program you may not want to call ExpandFilename(),
> > since on Windows this is not threadsafe).
>
> Then you only have the choice between relative paths working for long paths
> or threadsafe programs.
Well then, say goodbye to the Lazarus IDE, because we want and need both.
Mutatis mutandis for many real world programs out there, I guess.
Bart
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
