On Tuesday 18 June 2013 22:28:44 you wrote: > On 18 Jun 2013, at 22:22, Rainer Stratmann wrote: > > Yes that is with all kind of information if you don't have backgrund > > knowledge. > > Minimising the amount of required background knowledge and making > everything self-explanatory is a fundamental part of the Pascal > philosophy. > > > As reading your statement between the lines I think you would like to > > refuse the suggestion, right? > > Adding redundancy to a language is seldom a good idea. > Sure there is an 'explanation' for everything. Like the lawyers do.
Why don't you say you don't want to add because it means more work? _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
