On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt >> <mich...@freepascal.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote: >>> >>>>> No. The writer already uses a fixed buffer. Your problem is the use of >>>>> TXMLDocument. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ideas? Maybe do what Antonio Fortuny said before? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Simply put: logging to XML (worse: using DOM) is a VERY bad idea. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Well, this is a request of my client. Other process will read this XML. >>> >>> >>> >>> Under no circumstances should you use TXMLDocument for this. >> >> >> So, where is recommended to use TXMLDocument class? > > > General XML processing. Small documents. > > You should be aware that the DOM always has the whole XML document in > memory, plus a substantial amount of overhead. This is not something FPC > specific, but is inherent in the DOM model. (a W3 spec) > > Regardles of XML or not: keeping logs in memory is simply a bad idea. You > can buffer them for performance reasons, but after some time you must write > to file. > > The DOM model does not allow this.
Yes, I see now. I'll change my app. Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
