In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
> > with an appropriate definition of the + operator without risk that an error
> > would try to evaluate it as an ordinary arithmetic expression?
>
> We don't have constant to identify a qNaN.
>From math:
NaN = 0.0/0.0;
Infinity = 1.0/0.0;
NegInfinity = -1.0/0.0;
but of course that is just notation/convention (that 0.0/0.0 as literal
evaluates to NaN), it doesn't mean all archs do.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
