2013/3/26 Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> > Am 26.03.2013 06:53, schrieb Anthony Walter: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:20 AM, silvioprog <silviop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't know if you noticed, but I sent the ALL test cases required by >> the RFC 2202 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2202), i.e., it's enough to >> check whether the algorithm it's well implemented or not. >> >> I'll await the answer of the staff of Core, because for me the final >> answer is theirs. >> >> -- >> Silvio Clécio >> My public projects - github.com/silvioprog >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org >> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal >> > > I wasn't asking you to stop your work, rather I was attempting to share > insights and my opinions with the group. My point in the previous message > was that many times it make sense to reuse something which works, and > possibly part of the operating system, rather than recreating that which > already exists. > > We already have a "hash" package and I'm all for improving/extending it. > This can prove especially useful for platforms where OpenSSL is not > supported (think the embedded targets or similar here). Also I'm a big fan > of "as less non-Pascal dependencies as possible" :) > > Regards, > Sven >
+1. And I'm sure the hmac is fast as anything else out there who write, even using libs maked in C/C+. :) -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
