2013/3/24 Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> > On 24.03.2013 16:59, silvioprog wrote: > >> My function is more fast that cHash >> (http://fundementals.**sourceforge.net/dl.html<http://fundementals.sourceforge.net/dl.html>). >> The comparison result is: >> >> HMAC: 00:00:01:689 cHash: 00:00:02:038 >> >> My final unit is: >> >> http://pastebin.com/4484g9i8 >> > > Could you maybe run your unit through some test vectors if you haven't > done already? E.g. these: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/**rfc4231<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4231> > > If that works satisfactory you could create a bug report and we could > include it in the hash package. > > Regards, > Sven
Yes. I'll try to implement it now! :) For SHA1 this is the final implementation: http://pastebin.com/t4e3tvXa Now I'll implement it for MD5 conforming http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2202, create some samples showing HMACMD5 and HMACSHA1 and finally create a bug report. Thank you very much Sven! :) -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
