On 03/01/2013 04:37 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Ludo Brands wrote: > >> What about just using a 32k buffer? > > No problem with that as far as I am concerned. > > Since the code is shared between embedded and non-embedded targets, it > might be better to have the option to specify the size of the buffer to > use. > Being able to override the buffer size at runtime would indeed be the best solution. Embedded systems with a file system and short on memory to accommodate a 32k block is rather uncommon these days.
> In recursive cases, it means that Depth*BufferSize buffers will be > allocated. > Yes. Ludo _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
