On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 09:23:29AM +0000, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Sven Barth wrote: > > >>An llvm target will move the optimisation burden away from fpc, which > >>would be very interesting. > > > >While we would welcome a LLVM backend it is basically a consent in > >the development team that this would only be an additional > >alternative to the normal backends FPC provides. > > LLVM's target list doesn't look particularly brilliant compared with > FPC's :-/
How do you mean? It supports more architectures than FPC, as far as I can see (http://llvm.org/Features.html). They also have a C backend that you can use for targets that they don't support. Henry _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
