On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Frank Church <vfcli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 February 2013 19:35, Florian Klämpfl <flor...@freepascal.org> wrote: >> Am 17.02.2013 20:31, schrieb Frank Church: >>> One more thing lest I forget. The official FPC documentation is very >>> good, especially for documents created by volunteers and hobbyists. >>> That it is not accompanied by examples >> >> c:\fpc\docs>dir ex*.pp /s | grep -c ex >> 668 >> >> What do I miss? > > I am referring to the HTML docs at - > http://www.freepascal.org/docs.var. it's not the type that users can > leave comments and examples in, like PHP for instance. > > I am not complaining about the official docs, I actually praised them, > but users come to Lazarus and FPC with expectations based on what they > see in other projects and that is the cause of the complaints.
and the complains are justified. fpc as a project lack of people to do things. for ruby the Rails project brought a lot of people to develop with the language. at python it was django. what is the project that will make people to try and use pascal ? how can you find "new blood" to bring to the projects ? how can you make sure that people are interested ? > >> _______________________________________________ >> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org >> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > > > > -- > Frank Church > > ======================= > http://devblog.brahmancreations.com > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
