Am 17.02.2013 09:55, schrieb ik: > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Florian Klämpfl > <flor...@freepascal.org <mailto:flor...@freepascal.org>> wrote: > > Am 16.02.2013 20:45, schrieb geneb: > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 <tel:2013>, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > >>> I tried something like this before and I was suprised at the > dearth of > >>> Lazarus and FreePascal bloggers. Getting Lazarus and FPC developers, > >>> (let alone users) to blog about their experiences is like pulling > >>> teeth.I think a law should be passed requiring FPC users to blog > about > >>> their usage and experiences at least twice a year. > >> > >> Maybe not everyone is so enthousiast about blogs as you ? > >> > >> I agree with Florian; I prefer to work on FPC. > > > > While I can certainly understand your point of view, the more people > > that are talking about FPC and Lazarus, the more people that will > become > > exposed to it. > > Isn't the svn rss feed not the best opportunity to talk about > fpc/lazarus :)? > > > When I hear stuff like "sure pascal is cool but lack of good string > support", I think that it is more self explanatory then anything. > > At the local open source community I'm a known evangelist for Object > Pascal, and my blog is full of code, text etc, regarding stuff in object > pascal. > Some of the people over here that actually started using FPC/Lazarus > arrived due to my blog posts, so spreading the word is very important imho.
It is. But some might code, others might evangelize. What I wanted to say: those who are interested what happens in FPC in detail might follow also the svn rss feed. There is simply no need for the developers to blog about this. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
