JC Chu wrote:
It is not possible to extend an enumeration type. If you are not willing to use separate sets to hold common and extended elements, you can use a generic (not parametric) set type, say SET OF 0..31, that can hold all possible elements, and define the possible elements as constants.
Yes, except that that loses type checking. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
