On 20-11-2012 6:54, PathScale wrote: > I'm not soliciting legal advise and this is generally the wrong place to > ask/debate such questions. I strongly recommend you consult one of the many > professional and or pro bono legal resources available to open source > projects. I think this actually is the right place to debate legal questions relating to FPC development/inclusion in FPC source etc. But I understand not all of us enjoy legal debates when we could be programming ;)
> Check out path64-suite README on github for EKOPath 4 > https://github.com/path64/ Couldn't find readme in this repo (opened the debugger and the compiler ones)... assuming you meant this: https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite => Ok, that basically contains build instructions > EKOPath 5 and ENZO are substantially different and will have different > licensing restrictions/permissions Ok. > pathscale.com is not intended to be a gateway to the open source version and > or community support for that in any way. That could possibly be in error > and or change, but In the original press release we give those details. Ok so you're saying you're keeping the commercial/license model separate from the open source version. I understand... which would make any conclusions from licenses, documents etc from pathscale.com not necessarily valid/relevant for whatever is on github... and vice versa. Thanks, Reinier _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
