Hi, I am sure the ones included in FCL are much fancier and know OOP, etc. I have a relatively primitive one used here too:
https://github.com/GalapagosAdmin/PasViz I just use it for analyzing unit dependencies, so I don't need too many fancy features. Also, I didn't write the parser, and it is a bit out of date - I would like to modernize it, but free time is elusive these days. Also, if you like this one, I do have a newer version of the parser from the original author, which I haven't integrated into the project above yet. Obviously, it's open source, so I can share it with you if you like. Thank you, Noah Silva On 2012/09/01, at 3:48, Kenneth Cochran <kenneth.coch...@gmail.com> wrote: > First I'll say I know very little about the inner workings of an actual > compiler. I took a course on formal language theory ages ago so I do have > some understanding of the theory. Lately my interests have been pulling me > toward projects that either benefit from or depend on static analysis. So I'm > finding myself in need of a parser for object pascal. I'm wondering if fpc > exposes any of the output (syntax trees, graphs, etc) from the parser that > could be consumed by an external tool? > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
