Andrew Brunner wrote:
On 10/24/2012 08:36 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Why not use the library version of SVN ? This is how Tortoise does it, as
far as I know.
I think the focus then would shift to wrapping a library to hook into
server over HTTP. I would still need svn protocol or even maybe I could
look at Apache svn source (C++) to port to Aurawin's HTTP server.
One comment there if I may. Official SVN builds from e.g. Debian pull in
much more Apache code than is relevant. From the FPC wiki on Solaris:
"It might be less disruptive to build Subversion from source, e.g.
http://subversion.tigris.org/downloads/subversion-1.6.17.tar.bz2.
According to the INSTALL file the actual dependencies for a client using
the svn: (as distinct from http:) protocol are libapr, libapr-util,
SQLite and libz; these are available from e.g.
http://subversion.tigris.org/downloads/subversion-deps-1.6.17.tar.bz2";.
Start off with those, then see what else you /really/ need for http.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
