On 21-9-2012 8:42, Tomas Hajny wrote: > On Thu, September 20, 2012 17:30, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> On 20-9-2012 17:25, Jonas Maebe wrote: >>> >>> On 20 Sep 2012, at 17:18, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >>> >>>> Would looking into the actual fpmake bug make sense (i.e. is it doable >>>> for mere mortals like me?) Where would I look? >>> >>> It's probably related to how the makefiles clean the packages since >>> fpmake was introduced. Pierre posted a not really clean workaround >>> recently to the core list, see below (I don't think the patch will apply >>> as is though, because the formatting was changed by the mail client). >> Thanks a lot Jonas, looks like I'll stick to adding a workaround to >> fpcup... > > Actually, I believe that looking into the fpmake bug should make more > sense and yes, I think that it should be doable for "mere mortals" since > it is written in standard (Object) Pascal rather than requiring some > Makefile wizardry. Thanks Tomas,
What's the bug number? _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal