> And IMHO this all reeks of that. (dll name in component). > Sounds "easy", but it doesn't really solve anything. >
Making it easier for the programmer to specify the library he wants will put a halt on "this discussion returning in some way or the other every 6-9 months". What is recurring in these discussions also is the non- or badly-documented ibase60dyn.initializeibase60('whatever.so'), or equivalent, being brought up at one stage as "the" solution that should make an end to the discussion. So if a libraryfilename property would only solve the recurring discussions and miscomprehensions (assuming that is a shared objective) then it would already be a big step forward. Ludo _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal